Your Man About Town’s middle name is Moderation, Dear Reader; and although it is a somewhat awkward locution when making a full introduction, it nonetheless conveys the important fact that your Man About Town’s middle name is not Tom, Dick or Harry. I moderate. I facilitate. I have even been known, at times, to adjudicate.
Shortly after hurricanes Katrina and Rita in the Gulf Coast, I was dispatched to New Orleans by the corporate foundation that I worked for to figure out how to deploy our philanthropic disaster recovery commitment. It was a heartbreaking experience, compounded and complicated by the entrenched challenges New Orleans had struggled with for many years.
As with all natural disasters, the poorest suffered most in the immediate aftermath. What I, in my ignorance, learned for the first time was how the vulnerable continue to suffer long after the initial damage: tucked away for too long FEMA trailers, or separated from family, friends and vital supports, unable to access medical care, or shuttled from one temporary shelter situation to the next. Over the weeks, months and years following the storm there were dramatic and terrible increases in elder mortality, child poverty, murder, and mental illness.
Compared to the process of recovery in the Gulf Coast, and in spite of the many frustrations we feel with its pace in our region, New York City, New Jersey and Long Island have done remarkably well. For most of us, life is essentially back to normal: the kids are in school, we’re back at work, our homes have power, heat and hot water, and holiday shopping is underway.
But there remains a grave and nearly inevitable danger, as in all natural disasters, that we will “move on” without fully resolving the impacts on those most vulnerable, and inflict the mistakes of the past on our neighbors and fellow citizens tomorrow. Continue reading →
Happy New Year! And what better time to talk about my favorite ideas for getting us out of this fine mess of an economic jim jam we’re all bunched up in. But first, a recap of my previous two posts:
In Dear Mom (Part I) I talked about the absolutely bizarre and vitriolic discussion around what role US federal housing policy played in the collapse of the global economy. Basically, it played a very minor role, in spite of lingering (or, should I say, malingering) opinions to the contrary. When even the industry publication American Banker weighs with a super geeky online commentary saying pretty much what I already said in my blog post, I think we can all put this bugbear to bed.
In Dear Mom (Part II) I took a pretty heady Wall St Journal editorial by Republican dissenters to the Federal Crisis Inquiry Commission and broke down their top ten reasons for the economic collapse into plain English. I’m proud of this blog post, really. It works. And my mom says you should read it because it’s good for you.
But now that I’ve debunked the junk and laid down the ground, I owe it Mom and to you, dear reader, to put my money where my mouth is and talk about what my favorite fixes include. So to begin. Continue reading →
Wall Street greed, lax regulatory oversight, and excessive executive compensation fueled a global debt glut that finally imploded; and
Federal housing policies forced Wall Street financiers to provide high risk mortgages to unworthy borrowers, ultimately leading to an unstable housing market that finally collapsed and brought the economy down with it.
In my first post, I explained some of the background for these opposing views, and I also spent a substantial amount of time discussing why view #2 appears to be (a) freakishly out of touch with reality, (b) so freakishly out of touch with reality that even people who normally want to blame the government for everything can’t agree with it, and (c) in spite of (a) and (b), freakishly popular.
To add vinegar to gall, I don’t think view #1 really doesn’t do justice to the issues either. Continue reading →
My mom rocks. She’s the most big-hearted, intellectually curious, bright-eyed and good-looking mom in the world. Now, she and Pop came for a visit a few weeks back and Mom pulled out of her purse a couple of news clippings: Five Good Reasons Why Wall Street Breeds Protesters (USA Today), and Wall Street’s Gullible Occupiers (Wall Street Journal). She laid them down in front of me over a lovely brunch (at Kevin’s in Red Hook for you foodies out there) and asked in that demure Dayton, Ohio drawl of hers: which one should I believe?
Mom deserves an answer!
So, I’m going to give it my best shot. There are an awful lot of folks who have killed an awful lot of trees trying to sort this business out (and I will cite throughout this blog my personal favorites), and much black ink has been spilled. I’m going to try and give to you, in layman’s terms, what I believe the critical issues were and some ideas on how to address the current aftermath and future implications thereof. This may take a while. Ready? Continue reading →
As much about being evocative as it is about being provocative; and
That its central message (that the process is the message) will carry high resonance and should not be underestimated.
In my second post on November 15th (after the protestors at Zuccotti were evicted by the current administration) I wrote that I believed the protests were likely to escalate, and that stakeholders (elected leaders, police, institutional leaders, even the general public) would have to start choosing sides in ways that they hadn’t been forced to before.
Well, it’s been quite a week. There have been plenty of pretty raucous protests around New York City (with over 250 arrests), significant Occupy actions taking place in cities around the US, and now a viral video of students being casually pepper sprayed at UC Davis. Things have gotten uglier, and unfortunately I don’t think they are going to get better anytime soon.
Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss (but different)
Now here’s the thing. I remember an old friend of mine who’s an active union organizer telling me a few years ago with a weary sigh: You know, protests just aren’t what they used to be. We have an understanding with the police. We avoid confrontation. We have planned routes, planned times, permits, speakers. Our rallies are carefully staged events. Real protest the way I experienced it in the 60’s is long gone.
Well, guess what’s back in fashion? Good old unscripted, spontaneous, angry, intelligent and chaotic protest. But there’s a catch: as a society, we’ve forgotten how to deal with it. Or, perhaps more accurately, we’re now seeing that we never really did know how to deal with it in the first place, and what we never learned is now coming back to haunt us. Turns out, you can’t just casually pepper spray seated protestors practicing civil disobedience and expect a crowd of about 200 folks armed with digital cameras to go along with the program. The viral video showing protesters telling police that the protesters are granting thempermission to leave shows just how powerful the collective voice behind this action has become. The people’s mic has entered our collective consciousness, and we know how to use it.
And there’s another catch: I think the Occupy movement represents a significant advancement in social protest: highly connected, carefully documented, remarkably resilient, and yet as flexible as a hot copperhead. The escalation that we’re seeing in efforts to repress/displace/control the Occupy movement, on the other hand, have not advanced. There are some new toys on the scene (did you catch the new pepper spray gun the cop wields in the video?), but the attitude looks awfully familiar and, oddly, old fashioned. Kind of fuddy duddy, if it were’t so damn vicious.
Magic 8 Ball Says: Concentrate and Ask Again
Time for prediction number 3: We are far from done with the Occupy movement, and nobody really knows where it’s going to lead. That’s the beauty of it, and it looks an awful lot to me like that’s scaring the crap out of the above-mentioned stakeholders. I don’t think our elected/corporate/institutional leaders really know how to deal with our friends the Occupiers. They all look so darn mad, don’t they? Like a really pissed off parent. With riot gear. And right behind that anger they look really embarrassed, as if the rest of the world were saying: “Can’t you keep your kids under control? They are very misbehaved. You must be a terrible parent.”
We’ve already seen our leaders react by taking a swing. Just a little smack to get those unruly beggars back in line. And it really is coming off to the Occupy movement as paternalistic, short-sighted, controlling, and dismissive. The Occupy movement certainly is not going to be dismissed, and that kind of leadership will only continue to stoke the fires of the resistance.
So, to our dear leaders: you won’t have the luxury of sitting across the table from an adversary in a suit as nice as yours, who understands the inner workings of the machinery you run, and who negotiates terms through a series of finely wrought horse-trades. Nope. If you want to come to terms with the Occupy movement, you’re going to have to get down and dirty. Big, messy meetings. Too many voices, too many opinions, too many impossible requests. There won’t be a clean outcome.
What you need to build, or rebuild, is trust. And that can only happen when people feel like equals. Building trust and equality is about process as much as anything else. And as process goes, it’s going to be mighty humbling. Still, if you ask me, it’s the only thing that stands a chance of creating a sense of unity of purpose, and of engaging the collective voice of frustration the Occupy movement represents.